Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

From Putin's War to Climate Change: Reimagining the Concept of Lebensraum

De la guerra de Putin al cambio climático: reimaginando el concepto de lebensraum




Section
Artículos

How to Cite
Oslender, U. (2025). From Putin’s War to Climate Change: Reimagining the Concept of Lebensraum. Tabula Rasa, 55, 143-161. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n55.08

Dimensions
PlumX
Citations

Throughout the 2020s, a series of armed conflicts have unfolded, destabilizing entire regions and posing an extraordinary challenge to the international order. Among the most prominent conflicts are Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and the current Israeli government's war against the Palestinian militant organization Hamas in Gaza. In this article, those conflicts are analyzed through a political geographical lens, particularly focusing on the concept of Lebensraum, or “living space.” I will show how this concept—developed by German geographer Friedrich Ratzel in the 19th century— offers a key framework nowadays for better understanding the territorial drive underlying the warmongering logic in those conflicts. I will examine not only Russia’s invasion and Putin’s war against Ukraine through this lens, but also contexts of resistance, such as the territorial project of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Farc) guerrilla movement—which I suggest can be considered as an attempt at constructing a “revolutionary Lebensraum”—and, to a lesser extent, the Jihadist Islamic State (Isis) movement’s attempt to create an Islamic caliphate or a “Caliphatic or Jihadist Lebensraum” in the territories of Iraq and Syria in the mid-2010s. Drawing on that, I propose reimagining the concept of Lebensraum toward a more peaceful interpretation and application, removing it from its common conflict and war context. I do so through a biogeographical reading, extending it to the contemporary global climate crisis as a challenge for all humanity—a global struggle for our shared Lebensraum.


Article visits 0 | PDF visits 0


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Abrahamsson, C. (2013). On the genealogy of Lebensraum. Geographica Helvetica, 68(1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-37-2013
  2. Agnew, J. (2023). Vladimir Putin’s territorial trap: what the invasion of Ukraine reveals about the contemporary war-sovereignty nexus. En G. Daho & Y. Richard (eds.). War, state and sovereignty (pp. 43-70). Palgrave Macmillan.
  3. Agnew, J. & Corbridge, S. (Eds.). (1995). Mastering space: hegemony, territory and international political economy. Routledge.
  4. Agnew, J. & Oslender, U. (2010). Territorialidades superpuestas, soberanía en disputa: lecciones empíricas desde América Latina. Tabula Rasa, 13, 191-213. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.409
  5. Arendt, H. (1977 [1963]). Eichmann in Jerusalem: a report on the banality of evil. Penguin Books.
  6. Bassin, M. (1987). Imperialism and the nation state in Friedrich Ratzel’s political geography. Progress in Human Geography 11(4), 473-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913258701100401
  7. Bowman, I. (1942). Geography vs. Geopolitics. Geographical Review, 32(4), 646-658. https://doi.org/10.2307/210002
  8. Dahlman, C. (2009). Geopolitics. En C. Gallaher, C. Dahlman, M. Gilmartin, A. Mountz & P. Shirlow (eds.). Key concepts in Political Geography (pp.77-85). Sage.
  9. Echandía, C. (1999). Geografía del conflicto armado y las manifestaciones de la violencia en Colombia. Oficina de la Vice-Presidencia.
  10. Escobar, A. (2017). Designs for the pluriverse: radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.
  11. Escobar, A. (2020). Pluriversal politics: the real and the possible. Duke University Press.
  12. Foucault, M. (1997). Society must be defended: lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-1976. St. Martin’s Press.
  13. Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. University of California Press.
  14. Herwig, H. (2016). The demon of geopolitics: how Karl Haushofer “educated” Hitler and Hess. Rowman & Littlefield.
  15. Hill, F. & Stent, A. (2022). The world Putin wants. How Distortions About the Past Feed Delusions About the Future. Foreign Affairs (September/October), https://www.foreignaffairs.com/russian-federation/world-putin-wants-fiona-hill-angela-stent
  16. Kropotkin, P. (1902). Mutual aid: a factor of evolution. McClure Phillips & Co.
  17. Lefebvre, H. (1976 [1970]). Reflections on the politics of space. Antipode, 8(2), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.1976.tb00636.x
  18. Lemke, T. (2011). Biopolitics: an advanced introduction. NYU Press.
  19. Mackinder, H. J. (1904). The geographical pivot of history. The Geographical Journal, 23(4), 421-437. https://doi.org/10.2307/1775498
  20. McColl, R. W. (1969). The insurgent state: territorial bases of revolution. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 59(4), 613-631. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2561830
  21. Monroe-Hamilton, T. (Feb 27, 2014). Putin adopts a Russian Lebensraum policy. NoisyRoom.net, http://noisyroom.net/blog/2014/02/27/putin-adopts-a-russian-lebensraum-policy/
  22. Oslender, U. (2004). Construyendo contrapoderes a las nuevas guerras geo-económicas: caminos hacia una globalización de la resistencia. Tabula Rasa, 2, 59-78. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.207
  23. Oslender, U. (2010). La búsqueda de un contra-espacio: ¿hacia territorialidades alternativas o co-optación por el poder dominante? Geopolítica(s): Revista de Estudios sobre Espacio y Poder 1(1), 95-114. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/GEOP/article/view/GEOP1010120095A
  24. Oslender, U. (2018). Terror y geografía: examinar múltiples espacialidades en un mundo aterrorizado. Clepsidra: Revista Interdisciplinaria de Estudios sobre Memoria, 5(9), 68-85. https://revistas.ides.org.ar/clepsidra/article/view/364
  25. Oslender, U. (2019). Geographies of the pluriverse: decolonial thinking and ontological conflict on Colombia’s Pacific Coast. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109(6), 1691-1705. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1572491
  26. Pécaut, D. (2001). Guerra contra la sociedad. Planeta.
  27. Pinochet, A. (1974). Geopolítica. Editorial Andrés Bello.
  28. Reiter, B. (Ed.). (2018). Constructing the pluriverse: the geopolitics of knowledge. Duke University Press.
  29. Richani, N. (2002). Systems of violence: the political economy of war and peace in Colombia, State University of New York Press.
  30. Said, E. (1983). The world, the text, and the critic. Harvard University Press.
  31. Sarid, Y. (Aug 26, 2011). Lebensraum as a justification for Israeli settlements. Haaretz. https://www.haaretz.com/lebensraum-as-a-justification-for-israeli-settlements-1.380787
  32. Slater, D. (1986). Socialism, democracy and the territorial imperative: elements for a comparison of the Cuban and Nicaraguan experiences. Antipode, 18(2), 155-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.1986.tb00361.x
  33. Smith, N. (2003). American Empire: Roosevelt’s geographer and the prelude to globalization, University of California Press.
  34. The New York Times (March 14, 1946). Haushofer, Hitler’s ‘geopolitician’, commits suicide with his wife. p. 3. https://www.nytimes.com/1946/03/14/archives/haushofer-hitlers-geopolitician-commits-suicide-with-his-wife.html
  35. Visvanathan, S. (1991). Mrs. Brundtland’s disenchanted cosmos. Alternatives, 16(3), 377-384.
  36. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
  37. Weizman, E. (2007). Hollow land: Israel’s architecture of occupation. Verso.
  38. Zibechi, R. (2008). Territorios en resistencia: cartografía política de las periferias urbanas latinoamericanas. Lavaca.
Sistema OJS 3.4.0.5 - Metabiblioteca |